🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has declared it is claiming damages amounting to $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This action represents a clear response from the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign funds to aid Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

Based on accounts in local state media, the monetary authority initiated a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This sum corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

EU leaders will decide later this week regarding a proposal to use around €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal involves granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its defence and economic stability.

Most of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the primary custodian for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

Dispute on Ownership

EU officials have argued that their plan is on solid legal ground. Their position is based on the principle that title of the state assets still belongs to Russia, despite being it was frozen in European jurisdictions shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any use of the assets as theft. Authorities have threatened reciprocal actions, such as confiscating EU corporate holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a key role in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its funds. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Strategic Positioning

With statements interpreted as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a severe assault on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."

The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. It has previously stated it is contending with over 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

Although courts in EU countries are not expected to enforce rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts anticipate Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that such holdings can be identified," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities indicated they are working on measures to discourage other nations from aiding any Russian legal action against EU entities. Additionally, they are crafting safeguards to shield EU member states with assets in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

Under the complex scheme, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would remain unaffected.

Kyiv would only be required to repay the money if and when Russia consented to pay reparations for the immense destruction caused during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

Belgium, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an different approach for funding Ukraine. This involves joint EU borrowing to fund a loan, using unallocated funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, described the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian frozen assets, meaning it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a powerful signal that if you cause all this damage to another nation, you have to pay for the rebuilding."